Discussion about this post

User's avatar
LHN's avatar

I agree with Ellen. While it is fun to see the old articles in this format, they are hard to read. Even in Substack, there is only one level of zoom. For the pictures that are two pages (such as p. 89-90), the zoom is halved, so the words are correspondingly smaller, making it hard to read. It is also frustrating that each page is its own picture and you can't click forward from one page to the next to keep reading. I have to go back to the main page and click on the next picture, then adjust the zoom (again). It makes for a less-than-satisfactory reading experience.

The New York Times has archives where you can see the article/pictures in the archive but read the digitized version. Maybe something to consider?

Expand full comment
Sally laRhette's avatar

Great, I like to know this!

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts